The Primitives of Elixir Concurrency: a Full Example
March 19, 2019
X Follow Button
Previous articles about Concurrency in Elixir:
Let’s put in practice what we’ve seen in the last few articles about concurrency. In this article we see how to fully make our initial cryptocurrency example, using just HTTPoison module and spawn, send and receive to handle concurrency. At the end we will refactor it using Task, which makes everything far easier!
Our goal is to download concurrently different prices from Coinbase and return a map with the latest prices.
get_price function
Let’s see step by step how to get the current price of a single product.
iex> product_id = "BTC-USD"
iex> url = "https://api.pro.coinbase.com/products/#{product_id}/ticker"
iex> %HTTPoison.Response{body: body} = HTTPoison.get!(url)
%HTTPoison.Response{
body: "{\"trade_id\":60538353, ..."
headers: ...
...
}
iex> ticker = Jason.decode!(body)
%{
"price" => "3891.76000000",
...
}
iex> price = String.to_float(ticker["price"])
3891.76
Elixir
Copy
Ok, it works and we get the price as a float, but I wouldn’t put this code in a function straightaway: it’s coupled and needs a bit of refactoring.
Decoupling
Let’s start with something simple, defining a function ticker_url(product_id) to return the URL string for the given product.
defmodule Coinbase.Client do
@coinbase_base_url "https://api.pro.coinbase.com"
def ticker_url(product_id),
do: "#{@coinbase_base_url}/products/#{product_id}/ticker"
end
Elixir
Copy
Easy.
Now, by using libraries like HTTPoison and Jason directly in our get_price function, we are coupling the get_price implementation with its external dependencies. If in the future we want to change our HTTP client to something like Tesla or Mint, we’ll need to change the implementation of all depending functions all over our code.
Instead of doing so, we can create a new module called Coinbase.HTTPClient, which we use to wrap HTTPoison and Jason.
defmodule Coinbase.HTTPClient do
def get_json!(url) do
HTTPoison.get!(url)
|> Map.get(:body)
|> Jason.decode!()
end
end
Elixir
Copy
For brevity we are not handling any HTTPoison or Jason error. get_json!(url) makes a HTTP GET request and deserialises the JSON response, returning it in the form of a Map.
We now define our get_price function using only our HTTPClient module instead of HTTPoison and Jason.
defmodule Coinbase.Client do
alias Coinbase.HTTPClient
def get_price(product_id) do
product_id
|> ticker_url()
|> HTTPClient.get_json!()
|> Map.get("price")
|> String.to_float()
end
end
Elixir
Copy
We see how this code is easier to read, thanks to the Elixir pipes, and also easier to change, since if we want to Jason to Poison or HTTPoison to Tesla, we just need to change our HTTPClient.get_json!/1 implementation.
This kind of refactoring is also shown in the José Valim’s article, Mocks and explicit contracts, in which we see how decoupling makes easier to test our code. If you haven’t read the article, I think it’s worth it.
In sequence
We define a new function to get multiple prices.
defmodule Coinbase.Client do
def get_prices(products) do
products
|> Enum.map(&get_price/1)
end
end
Elixir
Copy
get_prices/1 enumerates the products list and sequentially requests the price for each one, returning a list of prices.
As we saw in a previous article where we started talking about concurrency, getting prices one at a time, is not very efficient. Our computer is idle most of the time waiting for the response from the server.
Let’s see how much time it takes to sequentially get prices for seven different products, so we can compare it later with the concurrent one.
Sequential requests
To benchmark the time we define Coinbase.measure_time(func), which runs the passed function, calculating the elapsed time.
defmodule Coinbase do
def cyan_text(text) do
IO.ANSI.cyan() <> text <> IO.ANSI.reset()
end
def measure_time(func) do
time_start = System.monotonic_time(:millisecond)
result = func.()
time_end = System.monotonic_time(:millisecond)
seconds = (time_end - time_start)/1000
cyan_text("time #{seconds}s") |> IO.puts()
result
end
end
Elixir
Copy
After reading Cool CLIs in Elixir (Part 2) with IO.ANSI, I decided to add some color to the benchmarking output. The time will then be printed in cyan, using the cyan_text function.
Great, let’s get the prices of these seven products, sequentially, and see how much time we need.
iex> products = ["BTC-USD","ETH-USD","LTC-USD",\
...> "BCH-USD","XRP-USD","XLM-USD",\
...> "ZRX-USD"]
iex> import Coinbase, only: [measure_time: 1]
iex> measure_time fn ->
...> Coinbase.Client.get_prices(products)
...> end
time 2.132s
[3895.98, 136.01, 58.04, 141.6, 0.3131, 0.105945, 0.271112]
Elixir
Copy
The function returns a list of prices: the first price correspond to the first product in the list “BTC-USD”, the second to “ETH-USD” etc. To make it easier to understand it’s better to return a Map like this
%{
"BTC-USD" => 3895.98,
"ETH-USD" => 136.01,
...
}
Elixir
Copy
where the product is the key of the map, and the price is the value.
Let’s change in get_prices/1 the function passed to Enum.map, returning a tuple with both product_id and price. We can then use Enum.into/2 to convert the list of 2-element tuples to a Map.
def get_prices(products) do
products
|> Enum.map(fn product_id ->
{product_id, get_price(product_id)}
end)
|> Enum.into(%{})
end
Elixir
Copy
And this time it returns a human readable result
iex> Coinbase.Client.get_prices(products)
%{
"BCH-USD" => 141.66,
"BTC-USD" => 3895.99,
"ETH-USD" => 136.05,
...
}
Elixir
Copy
Concurrent
We saw thatspawn runs the given function in a new process, returning immediately. We were able to make our requests concurrent. But, without messages we were only able to print the result.
We are now making the get_prices/1 concurrent without changing the function result. The output will be still a map with products and prices.
Let’s start focusing on making one single concurrent request, then scaling to multiple requests will be easy.
def spawn_and_send_price(product_id, dst_pid) do
spawn fn ->
price = get_price(product_id)
send dst_pid, {self(), {product_id, price}}
end
end
Elixir
Copy
spawn_and_send_price/2 creates a new process and returns immediately its pid. As we saw in the previous article, the way we receive the result back is using messages. For this reason we pass dst_pid as second parameter, which is the pid where we want to receive the result back in form of a tuple.
{from_pid, {product_id, price}}
Elixir
Copy
When we send the message back to dst_pid, we pass self() as first element of the tuple.self() returns the pid of the process where is called. In that case the pid is the one of the spawned process.
It’s always good to send some reference along with the message, so it’s easier for the receiver to understand what the message is about and from who is coming. Passing the pid is also useful to filter messages, in thereceive block, coming just from the chosen process.
Let’s try this function on iex.
iex> self
#PID<0.205.0>
iex> pid = Coinbase.Client.spawn_and_send_price("BTC-USD",self())
#PID<0.208.0>
iex> receive do
...> {^pid, result} -> result
...> end
{"BTC-USD", 3899.98}
Elixir
Copy
iex spawns a process which requests the price and sends it back to iex mailbox
Nice, we can define await/1 with exactly the receive block we’ve just used.
def await(pid) do
receive do
{^pid, result} -> result
end
end
Elixir
Copy
await(pid) waits to receive, and returns, the result sent from the given pid.
We now have everything to write a compact concurrent get_prices(products) function, using Elixir pipes.
def get_prices(products) do
products
|> Enum.map(fn product ->
spawn_and_send_price(product, self())
end)
|> Enum.map(&await/1)
|> Enum.into(%{})
end
Elixir
Copy
- The first
Enum.maprunsspawn_and_send_price(product_id, dst_pid)for each product, returning a list of pids. - The second
Enum.maptakes the list of pids as input, runningawait(pid)for each pid. It then returns the list of results. Enum.intotransforms the list of tuples[{"BTC-USD",3902.0}, {"ETH-USD", 135.98}, ..], in a Map.
multiple concurrent requests and receiving results
Let’s try it while measuring the time on iex.
iex> measure_time fn ->
...> Coinbase.Client.get_prices(products)
...> end
time 0.421s
%{
"BTC-USD" => 3902.0,
"ETH-USD" => 135.98,
"LTC-USD" => 58.08,
"BCH-USD" => 142.52,
"XRP-USD" => 0.3133,
"XLM-USD" => 0.106001,
"ZRX-USD" => 0.269627
}
Elixir
Copy
Fantastic, only 0.421 seconds. We see how this version is faster than the other one which took 2.132 seconds.
Task
We’ve built our concurrent function using directly spawn, send and receive. This was useful to understand how concurrency is handled in Elixir, but usually it’s much better to use modules like Task, which makes concurrency much easier.
Conveniences for spawning and awaiting tasks.
Tasks are processes meant to execute one particular action throughout their lifetime, often with little or no communication with other processes.
We refactor get_prices(products), getting rid of the two functions we wrote, spawn_and_send_price(product_id,dst_pid) and await(pid). We now use Task.async and Task.await
def get_prices(products, :task) do
products
|> Enum.map(&Task.async(fn -> {&1, get_price(&1)} end))
|> Enum.map(&Task.await/1)
|> Enum.into(%{})
end
Elixir
Copy
The dynamic is really similar of the one we saw in our custom version. If we run just Task.async, we see that the messages are sent to our current process.
iex> products \
...> |> Enum.map(&Task.async(\
...> fn ->
...> {&1, Coinbase.Client.get_price(&1)}
...> end))
[%Task{}, %Task{}, ...]
iex> iex(3)> :erlang.process_info self(), :messages
{:messages,
[\
{#Reference<...>, {"ETH-USD", 139.63}},\
{#Reference<...>, {"LTC-USD", 60.52}},\
{#Reference<...>, {"BCH-USD", 152.76}},\
...\
]}
Elixir
Copy
Task.async returns a Task struct instead of a pid, which will be used by Task.await to get the result from the iex process’ mailbox.
For the most passionate, a small challenge for you!
After playing around with the code above, try to remove the last step Enum.into into get_prices. The function will then return a list of tuples {product, price}.
Try to get the prices multiple times! Do you see anything particular? The requests we make are concurrent, each one takes a random and different amount of time, but the results are always in the same order. Do you know why?
Any ideas on how to put the list of results in order from quickest request to the slowest?
Feel free to answer below, in the comments section! I look forward for your suggestions!
Credits
A special thanks to Greg Vaughn, who helped me give a perfect title to this article!
Share this:
Disqus Recommendations
We were unable to load Disqus Recommendations. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.
❮
- 6 years ago
- 6 comments
Step-by-step guide how to build a polling api in Elixir and Phoenix 1.5.
- 7 years ago
- 8 comments
One of the beautiful things of Elixir is pattern matching. We'll see pattern matching …
- 7 years ago
- 9 comments
how to get started with Phoenix LiveView by creating a new Phoenix …
- 7 years ago
- 2 comments
Transforming an HTTPoison async response into an Elixir Stream, to easily process …
- 7 years ago
- 2 comments
Come up with a workaround to make LiveView play together with a JavaScript …
- 6 years ago
- 2 comments
Let's see how to use, in Phoenix LiveView, the phx-click binding along with …
- 7 years ago
- 5 comments
Focus on LiveView's primitives: the bricks we need to know to building a …
- 7 years ago
- 1 comment
After a quick intro to containers and images, we see how easy it is to run …
❯
tempest.services.disqus.com
tempest.services.disqus.com is blocked
This page has been blocked by an extension
- Try disabling your extensions.
ERR_BLOCKED_BY_CLIENT
Reload
This page has been blocked by an extension
Disqus Comments
We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.
G
Join the discussion…
Comment
Log in with
or sign up with Disqus or pick a name
Disqus is a discussion network
- Don't be a jerk or do anything illegal. Everything is easier that way.
Read full terms and conditions
This comment platform is hosted by Disqus, Inc. I authorize Disqus and its affiliates to:
- Use, sell, and share my information to enable me to use its comment services and for marketing purposes, including cross-context behavioral advertising, as described in our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, including supplementing that information with other data about me, such as my browsing and location data.
- Contact me or enable others to contact me by email with offers for goods or services
- Process any sensitive personal information that I submit in a comment. See our Privacy Policy for more information
Acknowledge I am 18 or older
Discussion Favorited!
Favoriting means this is a discussion worth sharing. It gets shared to your followers' Disqus feeds, and gives the creator kudos!
Tweet this discussion
- Share this discussion on Facebook
- Share this discussion via email
- Copy link to discussion
J
I enjoy a lot reading your Articles! #3
About why the order is always the same, it is because firstly you wait for the first msg, then second and so on. I think this could be solved passing a list of the awaited PIDs to the await function, so any of the requests can match at first.
see more
Hi Juan Carlos!
Yes, you got it! :D
Regarding the await is not possible to add a guard clause in the `receive` block, like
{pid, result} when pid in pids -> result
since the pids list should be fixed.
So, on this what I would do is to give a reference to the current download, and use the reference to pin the messages
We create a ref for each get_prices request. The ref is passed to the Enum.map, so the message we now receive is something like {ref, {pid, result}}.
def get_prices(products) do
ref = make_ref()
products
|> Enum.map(fn product-> {ref, spawn_and_send_price(product)}} end)
|> Enum.map(&await(&1,ref))
|> Enum.into(%{})
end
And the await function accepts the the ref as second argument, we could just only pass the ref and then number of messages we suppose tu receive.
def await(pids,ref) when is_list(pids) do
Enum.map pids, fn _->
receive do
{^ref, {_pid, result}} -> result
end
end
end
What do you think?
see more
J
aahh yes, I forgot to take into account that guards were for fixed lists.
Your solution seems to work great.
One doubt, why do you pass two arguments at Enum.map(&await(&1, ref)) you should only need the second one?
Thanks for the post! Keep up this amazing site!
see more
Good point. Yes you are right... my mistake, I did the map two times, one in get_prices and the other one in await. So as you said we could have something like
def get_prices(products) do
ref = make_ref()
products
|> Enum.map(fn product-> {ref, spawn_and_send_price(product)}} end)
|> Enum.map(fn _-> await(ref) end)
|> Enum.into(%{})
end
def await(ref) do
receive do
{^ref, {_pid, result}} -> result
end
end
So, in this way Enum.map(fn _-> await(ref) end) should call await just one time for each pid.
Thanks :D
see more
Thank you for the post.
see more
I enjoy reading your articles. I found a little bit not good parts. for example:
Enum.map(&spawn_and_send_price/1)
you actually define spawn_and_send_price/2 in your code so that we need add default parameter to it if we want to use &spawn_and_send_price/1
see more
Hi lambeta, thanks a lot for telling me this issue. I've just updated the code example.
see more
I enjoy a lot reading your Articles! #2
see more
I enjoy a lot reading your Articles!
see more
thanks :D
see more
live.rezync.com
live.rezync.com is blocked
This page has been blocked by an extension
- Try disabling your extensions.
ERR_BLOCKED_BY_CLIENT
Reload
This page has been blocked by an extension
pippio.com
pippio.com is blocked
This page has been blocked by an extension
- Try disabling your extensions.
ERR_BLOCKED_BY_CLIENT
Reload
This page has been blocked by an extension
tempest.services.disqus.com
tempest.services.disqus.com is blocked
This page has been blocked by an extension
- Try disabling your extensions.
ERR_BLOCKED_BY_CLIENT
Reload
This page has been blocked by an extension
Nerves powered Vision – Deploy YOLOv8 on RPi5 with…
Sep 5, 202514 sec read
Building a YOLOX Plate Detector – Setup, Fine-Tuning, Metrics,…
Aug 29, 20253 min read
Fine-Tuning YOLO to Watch Soccer Matches
Jul 17, 20255 min read
Twitter Widget Iframe